|
1
book, 3 videos and no funerals.
Hot damn. Uncle Geoff's shelves have been creaking with review
copies of books and films again this month. Here we go again, for
a taste of review heaven from deepest darkest Somerset ...
1. The Mammoth Book Of
UFOs by Lynn Picknett.
(Pub: Robinson. 537 pages. Price: £ 7.99 (UK). ISBN:
1-84119-075-6.)
website: www.constablerobinson.com
Everything you wanted to know about the current
state of affairs related to all things UFO plus a lot of case histories
from over the years of sightings and abductions. Food for thought
for anyone interested in the subject.
A few things missed Picknett’s path. No reference
to the fact that astronauts have seen some unusual sights while
in space or the ‘electric worms’ (see my article last month) that
frequent Earth’s atmosphere.
As I’ve previously also commented the problem with
UFO books is the lack of photographs. In this instance, one can
only guess would have increased the price as the Mammoth range like
to stay within a certain price range. This in itself should have
been more seriously considered, especially with such a visual orientated
subject.
This book doesn’t glorify the subject of UFOs
either. Kenneth Arnold - the pilot who coined the words ‘flying
saucers’ - is denounced for mistaking flying pelicans for unknown
flying craft.
The Roswell Incident is shown to be made from disparaging
incidents conveniently linked together by the media. There is the
occasional speculation against the sightings suggesting other sources
of more mythological nature might be behind it including Man’s own
ability for self-delusion.
This reviewer does raise some odd question marks
about that mainly from all the photographic evidence.
As a starter for information on the subject, the
price is reasonable enough to rush out and buy it.
If you want to pursue the subject further, there
is an excellent bibliography and a collection of contact addresses.
2. X-Men: The Movie Special
Edition
(20th Century Fox Home Entertainment Video 19942S.
100 minutes Price: varies £11.99-£14.99 so look around for the best
deal)
Actually, the film is 95minutes long with another
quarter of an hour devoted to the trailer, a brief featurette behind
the scenes meeting the cast and seeing some of the effects being
made and several deleted scenes.
Having only read what the DVD contains, other than
a few links, pictures and Hugh Jackman’s casting demo, it doesn’t
look like you’re missing that much by going for the video tape.
Relief all round.
Now, I have to confess to having a rather vested
interest in the look of this film. In one of my previous incarnations,
I ran the UK X-Men Fan Club for 20 odd years so am rather familiar
with the subject matter. It was an off-the-cuff comment to Chris
Claremont when I interviewed him years ago that resulted in Magneto
hailing from Europe.
Even back then, there was a lot of discussion about
how any director would get around the problem of dealing with so
many of the graphic X-Men such as Colossus, Nightcrawler and the
Beast. We also came up with the same conclusion: if they can’t be
used, then they’d have to be omitted.
It’s an accepted thing that what looks quite natural
in a comicbook is somewhat harder to depict in real-life let alone
on film. The transformation isn’t perfect but director Bryan Singer
has achieved a lot within such confines.
It also has to be remembered to supply sufficient
information for film-viewers who’ve never heard of the X-Men - you’d
think by now they should be reading press releases before going
to such films - while at the same time not talking down to the comicbook
fans.
In many ways, the X-Men movie has an almost dreamlike
quality throughout the film. Considering Singer said he was going
to have events happen in a reality not too far removed from our
own, I think too often he pulled back more than dug into it emotionally.
You end up admiring the use of the visuals, effects
and background scenery then realise there isn’t that much dialogue.
It was only when seeing the deleted scenes at the end of the tape
that it became apparent that it was deliberately exercised. It isn’t
that I want mountains of dialogue but to minimise as much as they
did seems a crying shame.
The aforementioned deleted scenes certainly indicate
there was little wrong with the material and would certainly have
added more dimension to the characters. The fact that they were
included to show the difference indicates some indecision as to
what they should have done in the original cut.
I suspect within the year, we’ll have a film special
edition putting all the deleted scenes back in. Saying that, if
you’ve got DVD - which I don’t - you can probably do that anyway.
I’m going to discuss the lack of super-hero costumes
in a separate article shortly - see ‘Hot Pants And Zoot Suits’ -
but the ‘X’ motif and even the Cerebro console in a big empty room
was more ‘Batman’ movie than its original source. It would have
been a better touch had Xavier used Cerebro in his study.
Using brighter costumes would have contrasted better
with the otherwise dark scenery on occasions. We’re in a world of
bright colours these days after all. There’s also an odd question
mark in my notes that it’s going to make a lot of kids think that
either leather or PVC is the preferred material for super-hero costumes.
Personally, I’d have thought this would have been
difficult to move easily in and dissipate sweat.
In terms of combat, the X-Men have always been
regarded as being at their best when they act as a team. Granted
it would have been difficult on the viewers’ eyes following combined
action but splitting them all up in battle doesn’t really demonstrate
the X-Men at their best.
There were a few more major niggles. Professor
X can’t take over other peoples’ bodies. If Magneto’s helmet prevents
Xavier from taking control of him, why weren’t the rest of the Brotherhood
given similar helmets or protection?
It’s a shame that Magneto’s helmet wasn’t given
more of the look from the comicbook. Was loosing the trident spike
such a major decision? Then again, it’s about time Jean Grey was
given a new code-name in the comicbooks as well.
Oddly enough, the cast’s height differentials
didn’t make much difference, especially as Wolverine is so short
in the comicbooks.
There’s a lot to be said for the quality of the
actors when it doesn’t become a big issue. One can only wonder if
Patrick Stewart was given an insurance to ensure that his hair grew
back after the film?
In a similar light, the reaction from the media
press suggesting the age differential between the characters wasn’t
that apparent either. Jean Grey and Scott ‘Cyclops’ Summers appeared
more the same age than not. Although Wolverine dominated film as
the eyes into this world, it might have helped had we seen more
of Cyclops’ leadership qualities.
All right, I’m probably niggling a little too
much. There were some nice touches showing some other students although
quite how Pyro got there beats me. I liked the touch of explaining
how Rogue got her white-streaked hair.
The plot revolves around Magneto and his cohorts
wanting to press home their belief that the ascent of mutants affects
everyone with the X-Men getting in the way of achieving his aims.
There haven’t been many super-hero team films.
Roger Corman’s ‘Fantastic Four’ never really surfaced before a big
studio binned it. The ‘Justice League Of America’ film was extremely
low-budget and pally to resemble its comicbook counterpart.
As such, The X-Men movie signifies the standard
all other super-hero team films will be compared to in the future
as it at least caught some of the essence of the original. Watch
and enjoy.
3. Doctor Who: The Daleks
(Remastered)
(BBC World-Wide Limited video BBCV6960. 172
minutes. Price: £11.99.)
I haven’t seen the first 7 part Dalek story since
1963. The only reason I hadn’t bought the video edition until now
was cos of the size and cost. 2 expensive video tapes takes up more
space than a single one. At last, the BBC have finally realised
this as well and it can now be bought on a single tape at a reasonable
price.
It’s rather odd seeing this story after so long.
Part of me watches with an editorial professional attitude while
the other sees it purely in terms of effective story-telling. This
story never had me originally hiding behind the chair watching cos
the events took place on Skaro.
It was more scary when the Daleks invaded Earth
- time that was released on a single video! Nothing brings home
a scare more when it happens on your home planet.
The introduction of the Daleks is rather different
from the image of exterminating Nazis as they were developed into.
Yes, they still had a rather vindictive approach to life but there
was also a demonstration that they could care for their prisoners,
albeit with ulterior motives, by regularly feeding them.
They were also extremely advanced if they had the
ability to create artificial sunlight and edible foods that even
the Thals could eat. As with all TV series, the focus tends to be
on the action of the plot rather than mundane things like what do
they do for sustenance.
Through this story we learn they have a greater
dependence on radiation than anything else but I doubt if this would
stop them having three square meals a day.
The Doctor and his companions arrive on Skaro
and discover they are in a petrified forest. They see the results
of a neutron bomb attack at first hand and through the mischievous
activities of the Doctor stay long enough to discover the survivors.
The Daleks are mutated and rely on travel machines
to move around in their metal city. The Thals have changed into
blond benign pacifists who come down to the forest from their own
plateau desperate for fresh food supplies.
Rather naively, Susan believes it possible that
an arbitration treaty can be formed between the two species before
discovering she has been tricked. From there, the TARDIS folk have
to ensure a civil war that ensures the Thals come out the victors.
From a plot logistics POV, the trip through the
swamp to the far side of the Dalek city is padding. It would have
made more sense had they did something important arriving that way
by messing up the Daleks power supply but this got lost along the
way. Saying that, there is enough tension along the way to only
worry about such things when left to analyse later.
Considering the restricted 1963 budget, this episodic
story holds together remarkably well. Whether the youngsters of
today will feel the same way is debatable. Back in the 60s, there
was little SF around to draw comparisons. If nothing else, this
is history as it was and if nothing else, it deserves respect for
helping to pave the way for all that followed since.
The effects of the Daleks on the British public
in the 60s has rarely been surpassed anywhere outside of Star Trek.
If you’re a fan of media Science Fiction, it will automatically
be accepted that you’ll be adding this to your collection.
If you’re too young to have seen it originally
and want to know what the fuss was about, this is worth a look.
If you’re my age, then it brings back some, well maybe not happy
memories - genocide never is - interesting memories. Watch and enjoy.
4. Galaxy Quest
(DreamWorks Home Entertainment video 4900403.
97 minutes. Price: £12.99 although I’ve seen it priced higher, so
look around.)
I have very mixed feelings about this film. I
loved the original intention of aliens believing that the exploits
of a TV SF programme were real and needed the crew’s aid in saving
them. What is annoying is these aliens also have the best lines
in the film.
All the human cast do is go from cliché
to cliché without any real indication of over-blown egos.
Actors that have been on and appear at ‘Star Trek’ conventions -
which the supposed TV series is based on - acknowledge it’s a massive
ego-boost to be recognised for work they’ve done in the past.
The ‘Galaxy Quest’ cast might be a disheartened
bunch of thespians unable to get any other work - something that
rarely happens to any of the ‘Star Trek’ main cast these days anyway
- but they don’t also have anything about them to want me to particularly
root for them either over their misfortunes.
A more unsympathetic bunch you’d never want to
meet. Whether this is a script problem or the actors afraid to take
it to the limit is debatable. American humour doesn’t always carry
over well to the British eyes as it is. It’s the kind of film that
would probably be better to heckle aloud than to watch in silence.
Yes, I recognised all the ‘Star Trek’ clichés
being used. One can only wonder if DreamWorks or its scriptwriters
had approached Paramount for permission to actually use the originals
and got turned down?
Visually, the film is stunning but considering
it’s Industrial Light and Magic doing the effects this shouldn’t
be much of a surprise. On reflection, I did wonder if it would have
been better had they ignored the human actor aspect and just played
the film as a straight SF movie would it have been better?
The problem is, I think it would have been. Sorry,
chaps, but this film could have been so much better and funnier.
Browse for
the latest books and videos for Dr
Who
FREE
SF MAGAZINE
Sign up for
the Crowsnest SF e-magazine - full of funny reports and gossip.
Be the first to find out about hot sci-fi opportunities & news!
more
on the magazine...
CHAT
ABOUT THIS STORY
NEWS
ARCHIVE
|