|
Lost
on the way to see the Brontosaurus
Mark
Leeper explores the BBC's miniseries adoption of the Lost World,
and finds it is the best of a not-very-good lot of adaptations of
Doyle's great adventure novel of a forgotten plateau with prehistoric
man and dinosaurs.
The dinosaur re-creations are effective, but there are major
discrepancies from the novel.
THE LOST WORLD
A film review by Mark R. Leeper
It
is not like the last decade did not have several adaptations of Arthur Conan Doyle's
THE LOST WORLD. There were at least three, having John Rhys-Davies, Patrick Bergan,
and Peter McCauley play the burley Professor George Edward Challenger. But
after the BBC finished their "Walking with Dinosaurs" with very realistic
dinosaurs, I suspected that the next natural thing to do with this technology
for creating lifelike dinosaurs was to juxtapose them with humans.
No
respectable non-fiction presentation could do that. One would have to do a classic
story in which humans interface with dinosaurs. There is only one, Sir Arthur
Conan Doyle's THE LOST WORLD. (Note, JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH does have
humans in viewing distance of an ichthyosaur fighting a plesiosaur seen from a
distance, but these are not really dinosaurs and it is only one sequence.) So
once again the Doyle has been adapted. BBC ,in cooperation with the A&E
cable network, has brought us a new version about 165 minutes long. The special
effects combine CGI and full-scale models to give us state of the art visuals
and dinosaur images that look realistic and fit our current paleontological knowledge.
This is the best version of the story we are likely to get for a while.
Willis O'Brien who created the effects for the 1925 THE LOST WORLD and then was
heartbroken when lizards were used in the 1960 version of the film would have
been very pleased to see this version. Doyle might have been a little less
pleased with the liberties taken with the plot. Bob Hoskins plays Challenger,
a scientist with the reputation for being a crackpot. He outdoes himself when
he claims that on his last expedition to South America he found a remote place
where dinosaurs still live. The Royal Society is skeptical but fits out
an expedition of four led by Challenger and the bland intellectual Summerlee (Edward
Fox), a skeptic who has no patience for Challenger's claims or eccentricities.
There is also game hunter Lord Roxton and news reporter Edward Malone. The expedition
finds the plateau where Challenger saw the dinosaurs all right, but their means
of exit is destroyed and they have to face the now all too real dinosaurs that
Challenger reported seeing. None of the cinematic versions of the novel
have been really faithful. The new version only roughly follows the Doyle and
creates two new major characters. Agnes Clooney, raised in the jungle near the
site of the plateau has lived in the jungle all her life and will act as a guide
at the plateau. Theo Kerr (Peter Falk) is her uncle, a Bible-thumping missionary
at odds with Summerlee over the issue of Creationism and Evolution. While the
triangle of Challenger, Summerlee, and Kerr contest science, a romantic triangle
of Clooney, Roxton, and Malone sprouts. The novel is "revised"
throughout. In the novel Challenger is the most irascible character with a reputation
for violence against newspaper reporters like Malone. Hoskins loses this dimension
and seems to be the most pleasant and amiable of the expedition members. The
story stars as great fun, though in the last hour the writing is disappointingly
pedestrian. Among the modifications from the Doyle is the effort to humanize
the sub-human ape men on the plateau. In the book they were cruel killers who
entertained themselves dropping their enemies over cliffs. That aspect was considerably
toned down for this TV version. This is the longest version yet made so
there is more emphasis on South American color than there was even in the novel.
The special effects are certainly what set this version apart from previous cinematic
adaptations of the novel. Still, the dinosaurs are not quite integrated with the
people. When we see an entire dinosaur, requiring CGI, it cannot quite interact
with the people superimposed in the scene. It was much like early Ray Harryhausen
rarely had the creatures he created interacting directly with people. When need
be, he could have cowboys lasso a dinosaur, but such effects were used sparingly
and it showed. In this LOST WORLD we see even less such interaction. People
will be chased by a dinosaur that looks realistic, but in a different plane from
the people. Admittedly, in the 1950s it was very easy to describe what was wrong
with the special effects of a film. In the 21st century complaints with the special
effects are more abstract and harder to explain. But some limitations are
still obvious to the eye. This is probably the best version of THE LOST
WORLD since the 1925 version. It will probably be a while until a better version
is made. I rate it a 6 on the 0 to 10 scale and a high +1 on the -4 to
+4 scale. Mark R. Leeper Copyright 2002
Mark R. Leeper
|