|
Shockwave (Trek)
After a mission goes horribly wrong, Captain Archer finds out that
all may not be as it seems. He glances in the mirror and discovers
that he's a six-year-old girl (actually, we're kidding about the last
bit).
Enterprise Season 1, Episode 25
Written by Rick Berman & Brannon Braga
Directed by Allan Kroeker
I'll say this for the B/B team -- they know
how to create a cliffhanger. Archer stranded in a wrecked future
nearly a thousand years ahead of what he knows, and the Enterprise
on the brink of destruction by roughly a zillion and a half Suliban
ships -- let's just say this situation does not suggest obvious
solutions to the viewer, or at least this one, and I consider that
something of a plus.
Something
else interesting about "Shockwave" is that for a while,
it doesn't necessarily have that "we must create some enormous
problem because it's the season finale" feel to it, but instead
builds a bit more gradually.
Enterprise is visiting a Perragan mining colony, and what appears
to be a freak accident ignites the colony's atmosphere, killing
all 3600 colonists instantly. Lt. Reed insists that he followed
every safety protocol to the letter, and the instruments bear that
out -- but there are still several thousand dead colonists.
That's not the sort of thing you might think of as season-finale
material ordinarily, but it works -- particularly because it provides
some emotional and "political" (for want of a better word)
jeopardy to go with the physical variety. Hoshi is clearly fighting
to hold herself together while reporting the news to Archer, Malcolm
is fighting equally hard in a different way to reassure himself
of his own blamelessness, and Archer simply falls apart internally.
Archer, in fact, seems more inclined to agree that Enterprise is
to blame than anyone else. When others point out that all the diagnostics
point to no problem, he insists they're wrong -- there must have
been a problem, because everyone is dead. He calls Admiral Forrest
with the news, and Forrest is as encouraging as possible under the
circumstances, but again Archer is not in the mood for sympathy.
"We came here to *meet* these people," he notes, "to
learn something about them -- not to kill them." Before long,
Forrest reports back to Archer that Soval is using this incident
to argue against the presence of humans in deep space, and Archer
informs Trip and T'Pol that their mission is over.
Now, this whole sequence of events didn't quite have the same emotional
impact as, say, watching the DS9 crew evacuate in the face of a
Cardassian/Dominion assault -- but it proved surprisingly effective
on a character level. In particular, we get a sense -- and one
that's all too rare -- that Archer really feels the weight of history
pressing down on him.
As Trip points out, he's used the phrase "we're making history
with every light-year" a lot -- but when an event happens which
is absolutely horrific, and Archer realizes that that event might
set Starfleet's goals back a decade or two, he just crumbles. When
there's a decision he can justify, he's fine -- but when he makes
a serious and irreversible mistake, he doesn't seem to have learned
how to deal with it yet. (It's akin to Kirk's reaction in the face
of Spock's death, although I hasten to add that it's not even close
to having the same effect on the viewer.)
Another nice offshoot of this is that we get to see, on some level,
just how far T'Pol and Archer have come. Six months ago, T'Pol
would probably be the one insisting that Archer must have violated
some protocol or another, and might well have been taking Soval's
side and trying to get Enterprise sent home. Instead, her primary
concern is whether Archer is fulfilling his responsibilities *now*,
and in fact promises to try interceding with her government if he
will with his own.
There are not a lot of Archer/T'Pol scenes which have really had
a ring of truth to them, but I think this one did. (Ditto the scene
where Trip helps Phlox pack -- Phlox's ever-present good humor annoys
Trip to no end, and that seems to match both characters quite well
under the circumstances.)
Then, of course, at about the halfway mark the episode becomes
a different story entirely. Archer goes to bed, but almost instantly
finds himself back on Earth, in his quarters from ten months earlier
-- just before Enterprise's launch, in fact. He's at a loss to
explain what's going on, but he's reassured that he's not dreaming
... by Daniels, the Temporal Cold War fighter who was seemingly
killed by Silik back in "Cold Front."
He took Archer back to this time because they need to talk privately,
and this seems an unlikely place for anyone to look. History, it
turns out, has absolutely no record of the Perragan disaster --
thus, it clearly wasn't supposed to happen. Another faction in
the war has interfered, trying to stop Enterprise's mission before
it goes any further.
Dramatically, this gets the plot going -- in other ways, though,
this also demonstrates some of the danger of a time-travel story.
For starters, I think it's a bit of a leap from "history has
no record of these events" to "therefore they didn't happen
without outside interference."
Records can be just lost, after all, particularly if they're of
events that aren't all that significant. (Take, for instance, the
Enterprise-C's battle at Narendra 3: Picard tells Garrett that
"history has no record of your battle with the Romulans,"
but doesn't conclude that the Ent-C should stay with them and avoid
said battle.)
The bigger issue, though, is that the episode picks up a lot of
exposition from here on out. Here Archer and Daniels have a lengthy
talk where Archer tries to figure out what's going on: if he's
here, where's his earlier self? If he's his earlier self, who just
went to bed after speaking with T'Pol? There was enough temporal
confusion that you almost expected to hear Daniels say something
like, "I realize this has been a bit of a Leap for you, captain"
and make the joke explicit. (Either that, or have Archer just get
off a quick "oh, boy.")
At the same, there's a dearth of other information. Did Silik
actually kill Daniels? Well, Daniels himself says, "He did.
In a manner of speaking." Nicely mysterious, but it also gives
the writers free rein to pretty much pull any stunt they want --
and I'm not quite comfortable with that much carte blanche.
As soon as the conversation's over and Archer's back in his quarters,
he calls Reed to his quarters and everyone else to a meeting in
a few minutes. As the recipient of much extra information, Archer
winds up confusing everyone with a great deal of new information,
advice, and orders. The gist, however, is that the Enterprise heads
back to the Perragan colony, where Archer intends to gather information
proving that his crew is innocent -- and with some of the information
Daniels gave him, he knows just how to do that.
We then get an act of everyone planning, building, and strategizing,
with everyone but Archer in the dark as to exactly what's going
on. Aside from much heavier doses of technobabble than we've had
in the series to date, however, this time I enjoyed being in the
dark, however -- because it was clear that Archer had information
we lacked and had come by it plausibly, knowing exactly what information
it was seemed less important.
So we build a beacon which lets us detect a Suliban cruiser through
its cloak? Sure thing. The action didn't have me on the edge of
my seat, but I enjoyed it -- and so did Archer, as it pretty much
came off without a hitch. The usual Big Three invade the cruiser
(after Malcolm damages it for them), make their way to some sort
of engine room, grab a few crucial data disks, and then get the
hell out.
So far, so good -- and since those disks have hard evidence linking
the Suliban to the Perragan disaster (and to the framing of Enterprise),
all seems to be well.
Except, of course, that the Suliban aren't going to take this lying
down. After Reed detects some engine imbalances, Archer trains
those same quantum beacons aft, and detects a ton of cloaked Suliban
ships in pursuit. He prepares to fire on them, but Silik hails
and urges him not to: when they drop out of warp, sensors pick
up enough weaponry on the Suliban side to make it clear that Enterprise
can't fight its way out.
Silik, simply put, wants Archer -- he's gotten his orders from
the mysterious future figure, and has been told that Archer is the
only important part of all this. Archer has five minutes to come
aboard a Suliban ship in the process of docking, or Enterprise will
be destroyed with all hands. Archer agrees, without hesitation,
putting T'Pol in charge of the ship and Hoshi in charge of Porthos.
Unfortunately, while leaving, he exits a turbolift and finds himself
in the midst of a ruin.
While Silik, concluding that Archer's trying to play him for a
fool, orders all weapons trained on the Enterprise's warp core,
Archer finds Daniels, now in what is presumably his normal clothing
and in a fairly advanced state of shock. Daniels brought Archer
here, to the 31st century (!), and in so doing has apparently destroyed
his own time.
Archer's prepared to go back and take his chances with the Suliban,
but Daniels sets him straight. "You don't understand. All
our equipment ... the time portals have been destroyed. Everything's
been destroyed. There's no way to send you back."
Fade to black.
The last act of "Shockwave" is one of the more enjoyable
acts I've seen from the show in a while. It was somewhat quiet
in a lot of ways, but built up a nice sense of mystery and foreboding
while remaining true to its characters.
I particularly enjoyed Archer trying to convince T'Pol that he
really traveled through time with Daniels: T'Pol may insist that
"the Vulcan Science Directorate has concluded that time travel
is impossible," but Archer's good-natured "well, *good*
for the Vulcan Science Directorate" is about all the answer
that claim deserves.
Archer's also willing, as usual, to risk himself for his crew --
mostly, I think, because he almost blindly trusts that fate will
get him out of whatever jam he puts himself into. The real meat
of the act, though, was the very last scene that sets up the cliffhanger.
Putting Archer in the 31st century may not be a huge surprise, but
it most definitely worked -- as I said at the outset, we're certainly
not facing a situation that invites obvious solutions.
In fact, I'm a little bit concerned by how open the whole thing
is. The first real cliffhanger in Trek history was "The Best
of Both Worlds," and I think most people agree that the second
half was a disappointment compared to the first. Why, apart from
the obvious fact that after a three-month wait we were almost bound
to be disappointed?
In part, because Michael Piller hadn't really written out part
2 and decided how he wanted to end the story yet, and as a result
came up with an ending that many found unsatisfying. I'm hoping
"Shockwave" doesn't have the same sort of problem, and
that Berman and Braga already know exactly how they'd like to resolve
this situation. I don't know offhand why that should affect our
perceptions as viewers, but I've been around long enough that I
know it does in many cases.
So -- a bit too
much <tech>, a few slight cases of "the viewers don't
need to know this" syndrome, but all in all a pretty successful
episode.
Other thoughts:
-- When Archer's in his quarters brooding, he appears to be looking
at pictures of the dead colonists. I imagine Mike Okuda sneaked
a few interesting pictures and/or captions in there, but I saw it
as particularly reminiscent of the "Portraits of Grief"
series the New York Times has run in the wake of September 11.
(Even the number of dead is about the same.) Intentional, you think?
-- The scene in sickbay right after the disaster was particularly
well paced, with everyone getting in little tidbits of information
in between Archer's explosions. I especially liked his "that's
impossible -- there were 3600 colonists!" in terms of urgency.
-- The Hoshi/Travis
breakfast where they discuss future plans seemed pretty true to
both characters, and it's interesting to see how fiercely defensive
of Archer Hoshi can get.
-- True to his armory-officer nature, Reed really wants to look
at *all* the schematics Daniels left lying around, not just the
Suliban one. Good work there.
-- As amusing as "Just like those old Bible movies, Malcolm
-- it wasn't written" was as a line, it again suggests that
Archer (and perhaps Daniels) is putting far too much faith in historical
records. One could certainly play with that in interesting ways
if one had a mind to.
That pretty much does it, both for the review and for the season.
(Yes, there's a season-end review coming up sometime this summer,
but don't expect it any time soon.) "Shockwave" isn't
the best episode of the season, but it's far from the worst -- and
it's certainly going to keep us all guessing for a while.
So, to wrap up:
Writing: A bit more tech-heavy and/or confusingly mysterious
than it needed to be, but fundamentally solid.
Directing: The action felt a little pedestrian, but the
closing scene was a killer.
Acting: Not a lot of standouts (except possibly for Keating
and Park), but no complaints either.
Overall: Call it an 8: certainly worth coming back for the resolution.
Tim Lynch
Castilleja School, Science Department
Copyright 2002, Timothy W. Lynch.
This article is explicitly prohibited from being
used in any off-net compilation without due attribution and *express
written consent of the author*. Walnut Creek and other CD-ROM distributors,
take note.
|
|
OTHER CONTENT - September 2002
Martina Pilcerova interviewed Talented Slovak science fiction artist Martina Pilcerova on how Star Wars changed her life, plus the fun you can get creating fantasy paintings in the ex-soviet block. You'll be served up a couple of her stunning images too. (INTERVIEWS)
When gravity falls What comes up must come down? Not according to the latest Russian research into antigravity. Our own Stephen Hunt investigates, and finds a potpourri of secret science, half-truths and tantalizing rumours of the soviet 'Roswell'. (ARTICLES)
Two Days and Two Nights (Trek) The Enterprise crew takes two days of shore leave on the pleasure planet of Risa. But does a tale of interstellar 'Holidays from Hell' make for an engaging plot? (TV REVIEWS)
Shockwave (Trek) After a mission goes horribly wrong, Captain Archer finds out that all may not be as it seems. He glances in the mirror and discovers that he's a six-year-old girl (actually, we're kidding about the last bit). (TV REVIEWS)
Time Gentlemen Please Rod serves up an historical Perspective of HG Wells' 'The Time Machine' - in print, as well as HG's recent sfx-dripping voyage onto the big screen. (TV REVIEWS)
Reign of Fire Flipping fire flaming dragons! Mark finds a movie idea that could have been, well, so intriguing, but instead was mishandled, avoiding showing the most interesting scenes of the story. (FILM REVIEWS)
Eight Legged Freak Our Mark discovers a film that goes for every pun and silly joke it can muster to fill in the spaces between those giant arachnid attacks. Pass the spider catcher, my dear. (FILM REVIEWS)
Signs In this UFO horror flick, Mel Gibson must protect his family from something real or imaginary that has not shown its face, but has seemingly left signs of its presence around the world, causing international anxiety. Hey, who burned those blinking weird circles in my lawn! (FILM REVIEWS)
All that glitters is not Gold Member Yeah ... baby! Are you ready to endure the same ol' exploits with the randy rogue Austin Powers? How about going on a permanent mission in an attempt to put the four-eyed goofball spy out of his misery ... please. (FILM REVIEWS)
Explorer's findings Short news snippets for September. Including the sad death of book-cover illustrator Ron Walotsky and the odd departure of Science Fiction Chronicle's founder Andrew Porter from said publication, followed by a trail of rumour and 'no comments'. (COMMENT)
Robert Newcomb interviewed The fantasy author behind 'The Fifth Sorceress' talks about magic as physics, his past life on the lot of a car dealership, and why the best kings are reluctant ones. (AUTHOR INTERVIEWS)
|

CHAT
ABOUT THIS STORY
Advertise
Here (More ...)
|