|
The Expanse (Star Trek Enterprise)
In the season finale, an attack on Earth by a new alien race brings
a change of mission for the Enterprise. Tim discovers lots of setup,
but not a lot of payoff.
"The Expanse" Enterprise Season
2, Episode 26 [season finale] Written by Rick Berman & Brannon
Braga Directed by Allan Kroeker
Before
I begin the review proper, an announcement is in order, albeit one
which probably won't surprise people.
When I started reviewing Enterprise two years ago, I said
that I wasn't sure how long I'd be able to keep it up or to keep
it timely. Most of this season has seen problems with the "timely"
part, and as of this review I think I have to bring my regular reviewing
to a close again, this time very likely for good. Simply put, there's
just not enough time any more.

Teaching is not a career which admits a great deal of free time
anyway, and I've spent far too much of this year with my subconscious
wondering when I'd find time to catch up on reviews, making any
given review more a chore than a labor of love.
I suspect that means this season's reviews haven't been as well
written as past ones, and it's a given that they've been less useful
when they come so late ... but the core of the whole thing is that
I'm simply not getting enough out of doing them to make the time
investment worthwhile.
(Would that change if I were routinely getting shows that reminded
me of past glories, like DS9's second season or TNG's third? Probably,
but that's not the case here.)
[Oh ... and if people are wondering whether a "Nemesis" review
is still on the slate, despite being long overdue, the answer is
a definite "maybe." Now that the DVD is out, I may have more of
an excuse than I did in the spring, and I've certainly got a bit
more time at this particular moment. If the review's not out by
later this summer, however, it won't be out at all.]
That said, on to "The Expanse."
I imagine there are few regular _Enterprise_ viewers who didn't
know in advance that "The Expanse" would represent a retooling of
the series, a setup for "all-new, all-different" adventures in season
3.
I suspect that very few of those viewers, however, suspected in
advance the extent to which "The Expanse" is nothing but
a retooling. This isn't just a case of being able to hear the gears
squeak: there was so much thrown in here that the episode's just
too noisy for words. There's little to no signal here.
It's not as though Enterprise was lacking in potential plot
lines before this. There's been the gradual growth of tensions with
the Klingons, the Vulcan-Andorian conflict, the gradual growth of
Earth's deep-space capability (and its effect on human society,
especially boomers), the looming threat of the Temporal Cold War,
and of course the eventual rise of the Federation. I can't say the
series has necessarily done these all justice, but it's set up plenty
of long-term issues that could be fodder for a host of stories.
"The Expanse" didn't quite wave its hand and make all those stories
go away, but it seems to be doing its best to make most of them
irrelevant, at least for a while. Instead, we get a mission into
new territory that seems to give all the established races the willies,
ensuring that the Klingon and Vulcan-Andorian stories are going
nowhere for a while, a cause for the mission that is going to slow
down Earth's progress quite a bit - and while there's an attempt
to link this story to the broader Temporal Cold War plot, it's presented
much more as a handoff than anything else.
The catalyst for all of this is an attack on Earth, presented fairly
brutally in the first forty seconds of the episode. A probe arrives
(either cloaked or via some non-warp technology), and carves a swath
from Florida to Venezuela, killing seven million people in the process.
The initial scenes dealing with everyone learning about it are
probably the best of the episode: we don't get to see much of people
outside the big three outside of Archer's initial announcement,
but some of the better nonverbal acting came up when they finally
arrive at Earth and see the damage for themselves. Words would probably
have gotten in the way during that scene, honestly.
Trip is particularly hard-hit, of course, because he's originally
from Florida, and has a younger sister who still lives there. He
spends the early part of the show trying to find out what part of
the state was hit, and also wondering who could be responsible for
the attack.
There's a particularly wrenching moment when he and Reed stand
on the edge of the canyon carved by the probe, when Trip's coming
to terms with the fact that his sister's been killed. There's not
a lot of emotion on the surface for these two (at least in this
case), but Trip's clearly in agony and Connor Trinneer does a good
job showing it.
I'm less thrilled by the revenge kick Trip gets on afterwards.
I understand why the character would feel that way, but Trinneer
doesn't snarl nearly as well as he does other reactions. More crucially,
his insistence that this shouldn't be a case of holding back, that
T'Pol's "noninterference crap" should no longer apply, strikes me
as risky if it's really the new sense of the series.
Like it or hate it, the idea of noninterference has been part
of Trek for three decades, and having a series chuck it away in
favor of just blasting a few "bad guys" (a term Archer explicitly
uses) feels like it's taking away one of the few things that's keeping
this series in the Trek universe rather than being a generic action-adventure
show.
Before Enterprise gets back to Earth, however, they're briefly
surrounded by Suliban, who take Archer to Silik. Silik had nothing
to do with the attack, however: he's there to bring Archer before
his mysterious contact from the future. Said shadowy figure tells
Archer that the attack was carried out by a race called the Xindi,
who've gotten their own future informant and know humanity is destined
to destroy them in four centuries.
They're working on a super-weapon to wipe Earth off the map before
that, and the probe was just a start. Thus, Archer's new mission:
he needs to track down these mysterious Xindi and stop them before
Earth is destroyed.
First, though, he's got to convince Starfleet that this information
is genuine. He does so in probably one of the worst "science" scenes
I've seen in a while. First, it's not a great scene as drama, because
the Archer/Forrest dialogue is so stuffed with exposition that it
feels a lot more like a lecture than anything suspenseful. Second,
the "quantum dating" scanner is really just a magical plot-advancement
device.
If the idea is to draw an analogy with carbon-dating, it's not
a successful one: carbon-dating only works if you know (or have
a good guess of) the original isotope ratios, for one thing, which
is why we wouldn't be able to carbon-date stuff we find on, say,
Europa.
More crucially, though, the idea that this scanner can give an
answer it was never designed to is completely stupid: it's like
expecting an abacus to yield a complex-number answer or a computer
to calculate, to the last digit, the value of pi. (Seems I've heard
that last somewhere...) No - it's just going to give some sort of
error message, not a negative age.
Even given all that, Soval's still the only one making sense. When
Archer challenges Soval to come up with another explanation, Soval
says that "the lack of another explanation doesn't make your assumption
correct." Someone on the show has a grasp of scientific principles
- alas, it's the one we're all supposed to chide as an oppressive
old stick-in-the-mud. Sigh.
Getting back to the main story, however, once Archer manages to
convince Starfleet that his voodoo-obtained information is genuine,
they agree to his new mission: once his ship's refit is done, he's
off to the Delphic Expanse. I've heard worse premises, though this
doesn't strike me as one that's likely to do the series any more
good than what the last two seasons have done.
Why? For one, there's the historical factor. One heretofore unknown
race getting power from the future I could see as fitting into Fed
history, if barely. A second one which kills seven million humans
in one shot? And no human we've met over the entire history of filmed
Trek has ever seen fit to mention that little detail? Sorry - too
huge for my book.
That's akin to writing a history of the 21st-century U.S. and leaving
out the September 11 attacks (which seemed consciously paralleled
here). One might, might be able to swing this if there winds
up being no change in the society after the attack, but that strikes
me as unlikely. (Of course, there's always the option that the Temporal
Cold War will hit the giant reset button in the sky, but I'm not
suggesting that by any stretch.) There's also a second reason, but
I'll save it for later in the review.
The other substantial part of the premise is that the coordinates
Archer received put the Xindi in a region of space called the Delphic
Expanse. That rather oracular name masks a region where strange
things happen on a regular basis: most ships that enter never return,
and those that two come back with crews who are insane, physically
altered, or just dead. To paraphrase Ambassador Soval, there are
stories of new and dangerous species, strange anomalies (as opposed
to normal ones), and places where the laws of physics might not
apply. In short, it's a wacky, high-concept place. I can see the
spatial/temporal anomaly stories spilling out already.
The biggest problem "The Expanse" has to deal with is that's it's
just way, way too busy. There's the attack on Earth, followed by
Archer's meeting with the shadowy ambassador from planet Newplot.
Archer then has to convince Starfleet that the information is genuine,
get his ship refitted, and head out to this new and mysterious region
of space.
That would be a more than sufficient story in and of itself: we
could have spent a great deal more time on Earth than we did. Instead,
the story gave us not one, but TWO more plotlines to deal with in
this episode as well.
One of them is that the Vulcans don't want T'Pol to go on this
new mission, and flat-out order her to go to Vulcan. T'Pol does
some soul-searching (which puts Phlox to fairly good use, and a
use to which he's been put before), and eventually decides that
she's needed on the mission and that she wishes to remain aboard,
even resigning her commission in the process.
The problem with that plotline is that it's patently obvious she's
not going to leave, ever. She's not only a regular character, but
the ship's resident sexpot, for heaven's sake - if "Bounty" is any
indication, half of next season can simply be entitled "Star Trek:
Sweaty Heaving Breasts" and the ratings might tick up.
I appreciate that she had to do something permanent like resign
her commission in order to stay on board, but would it have really
hurt to go to Vulcan and see her have a little standoff with
the High Command? Having that resignation occur more or less behind
the scenes makes it way too forgettable - this could be like almost
every other Trek resignation, where the party's reinstated as soon
as the crisis is over.
The other plotline that's brought in is a continuation of the Klingon
arc. After Archer's escape in "Bounty," the Klingons are furious
and want Archer brought back Right Now Dammit. To that end, they
set Duras on Archer's trail again, giving him one last chance to
regain his honor. Thus, we have not one, not two, but three battles
between Enterprise and Duras' Bird-of-Prey, culminating in the Bird-of-Prey's
destruction at the edge of the Expanse.
This plot, with all due respect, was one that felt utterly unnecessary
for the story everyone was trying to tell. In a show this busy and
this dense, why have three battles that are essentially filler?
It felt as though this was an attempt to wipe the Klingon slate
clean, or at least leave it at a good stopping point while Enterprise
gallops off to save Earth.
I'm sorry, but I don't much see the point - the Klingons weren't
so looming a threat that things needed to be resolved this instant.
If the idea here is that Archer's third escape will set the Klingons
fuming ever more, there's no reason why a second one couldn't have
done the same. This felt very much like an attempt to keep the action
quotient high, and there are times that's just not a good idea.
(Would "Dear Doctor" have been better with two fistfights and three
phaser blasts?)
Having some action in as filler is potentially okay, even in a
story this dense. Unfortunately, it's undercut this time by the
fact that Duras is really not very bright. He attacks Enterprise
when it's in full view and easy range of other Earth ships, and
after his second attack when he realizes their weapons have been
upgraded, what's his brilliant idea?
Guard his front leaving his stern completely vulnerable. I suppose
the advantage of seeing this plotline resolved here is that Duras
can now be classified more permanently as too stupid to live. :-)
Basically, instead of having one or two stories that are given
some room to breathe, we got something like four: the attack on
Earth and its effect on both the mission and Trip, the Suliban handing
the "villain" mantle over to the Xindi, Duras' pursuit, and T'Pol's
crisis of allegiance. There's no way a single hour could have done
all that justice: perhaps a two-hour story would have worked a bit
better.
I could see an easy way to do it, too: spend most of part 1 in
the dark about what really happened, dealing mostly with Trip's
problems and how Starfleet might try to deal with the catastrophe.
End part 1 with the Xindi revelation, and part 2 with the new mission
and T'Pol's loyalty question. You might even have time to work in
Duras if you really wanted to.
Instead, we got several minutes of Klingons, a few minutes of Suliban,
a couple of scenes with Archer trying to convince everyone he's
telling the truth, and other scenes scattered hither and yon.
In the end, though, "The Expanse" really hasn't gotten me all that
excited about _Enterprise's_ "bold new direction." I mentioned the
nitpicky continuity-freak reason earlier, but the real reason is
that I don't think it's actually going to change all that much.
As I said before when I listed all the plotlines in existence currently,
the series' main weakness is not its setting.
The series' main weakness is in the stories it chooses to tell,
and more importantly the way in which it's done. A lot of the best
shows of this season - "Dead Stop", "Cogenitor", "Cease Fire", "Judgment",
etc. - are not ones which would be made any more likely by this
premise, and something like "Cease Fire" or "Judgment" is a lot
less likely now. On the other hand, "A Night in Sickbay" and "Bounty"
are just as easy to do, as is "Precious Cargo" in most ways.
What this new premise does make more likely is high-concept "sci-fi
wackiness" shows. "Singularity", "Vanishing Point", and "The Crossing"
come to mind as three prominent examples from this season, as do
countless examples from Voyager. Those three episodes weren't
terrible shows - but they didn't do anything to make viewers want
to come back, either.
Even more importantly, in a lot of ways they're fluff pieces: everything's
reset back to normal at the end (literally, in the case of "Vanishing
Point"), and no one's really learned much or changed at all. An
occasional episode like that can work, but a steady diet of them
is like trying to survive on nothing but Twinkies.
Other observations:
- Old-time Marvel Comics readers may have the same thought I did
when the probe started carving into Earth: "check to see if it translates
as 'Terminus.'" (Of course, fans of the animated Tick series may
simply have been looking for a giant "CHA"...)
- Similarly, when Archer tells T'Pol, "Trip's sister lives in Florida,"
was anyone else thinking of "Lex ... my mother lives in Hackensack"
from the first Superman film? I kept expecting T'Pol to look at
her watch and shake her head...
- And yet again ... Admiral Forrest telling Archer that there were
a lot of people depending on him was a vintage "Airplane!" moment
from start to finish.
- Please, please, please tell me Trip's sister isn't going
to turn up later as a captive. (Of course, "The Prisoner of Xindi"
is perhaps too obvious a title to pass up at some point down
the road ...)
- Part of Enterprise's upgrade is "photonic torpedoes." Right up
there with the shieldic hull plating. Folks, if it's the same stuff
please just say so: I'd have no problems with the torpedoes themselves,
but the coy treatment about it all bothers me.
- What with Archer using the term "bad guys," Trip's argument that
we damn well better interfere everywhere, and the military coming
on board the ship, however, I'm waiting for the inevitable Donald
Rumsfeld cameo next season. I certainly won't be surprised to hear
Trip say, "you're either with us or against us."
- We do get a quick glimpse of NX-02, which is due to launch in
fourteen months. Given that two months go by between that scene
and the end of the episode, that makes it an even year. Season 3
finale, anyone?
- T'Pol had a perfectly good reason for staying with Phlox: he's
the one treating her illness, and no Vulcan doctor is likely to.
She obviously couldn't tell that to the High Command, but it's something
she could have mentioned to Archer or Phlox easily enough.
- When Enterprise leaves Spacedock, it looked to me as though the
footage used was exactly the same footage as seen in "Broken Bow."
Anyone know for sure?
- Speaking of footage, the film quality on the bridge during the
last battle with Duras was decidedly odd. I think it was intentional,
but it struck me as very distracting. What'd they do?
- If we're really heading into a region of space where strange
things happen, are Archer and T'Pol going to get a Mulder/Scully
dynamic going? Brannon Braga did say many years ago that he wanted
to write the "X-Files" of Trek - and there's even a sister involved
here, albeit Trip's.
- Lastly, Archer's closing words are "Let's see what's in there."
I don't know if that was a conscious echo of Picard's "Let's see
what's out there" at the end of TNG's pilot, but I suspect so.
That about covers it. As an episode in itself, "The Expanse" had
a fair number of good bits, but slammed together with no room to
breathe or grow. As a setup for next season, I remain skeptical.
I hope this new direction works well for the show - I really do.
The series hasn't driven me away the way "Voyager" did, as I expect
to keep watching for a little while at least ... but it's not left
me panting with anticipation for season 3.
Wrapping up:
Writing: Some good moments, but very, very cluttered.
Directing: Not a lot stood out either way.
Acting: Praise for Trinneer, most of the time. None of the guest
stars had enough to do.
OVERALL: 7, I think. A watchable hour, but not marvelous.
Thanks to readers one and all - it's been fun. That's all for me.
Tim Lynch
Copyright 2003, Timothy W. Lynch. All rights reserved,
but feel free to ask... This article is explicitly prohibited from
being used in any off-net compilation without due attribution and
*express written consent of the author*. Walnut Creek and other
CD-ROM distributors, take note.
Did
you like ST Enterprise? Post Here.
|