|
Star Trek: Nemesis
As the "Star Trek" series seems slowly to lose steam, Mark finds
the movie contains one late - uncharacteristic - burst of life and
energy, a science-fictional examination of the nature-nurture question.
Picard and Data each meet physically identical copies of their former
selves and each must deal with the similarities and differences. The
question faced is, what makes a person who he is?
Over
the last few years there has been less excitement in things labeled
"Star Trek." The series, perhaps like many of its original
fans, seems closer to the end than the beginning. The excitement
seems to have disappeared.
For both the films and
the television show the danger has gone out of their universe as
the crews in each series comes out on top week after week after
week. Diverse new alien races introduced are more and more a fashion
show of rubber appliqués.

Major characters are
killed for dramatic effect, then brought back from the dead or replaced
with nearly identical copies. The old fun and jeopardy are just
not there any more. Bones and Scotty and Kirk and Spock used to
be as interesting for their personal interplay as for their parts
in the science fiction story.
Now in the films the
personal moments are an embarrassment that the audience hopes end
quickly. It would be smart for the Trek writers to give up on having
their characters try to sing or play Shakespeare. But as the series
cools, STAR TREK: NEMESIS may be one late bright flash.
The title STAR TREK: NEMESIS does
not really fit this film. Or rather it fits any other "Star
Trek" film with a villain just about as well as it fits this
one. A much better name might have been STAR TREK: DOPPLEGANGER
since the story is really about both Picard and Data meeting and
dealing identical copies of themselves. Picard meets a commander
who was cloned from his own cells.
Data meets a prototype
of his model of robot. How does one relate to an identical equal?
How does one compete? That is what this episode is all about and
the intelligence of that science fictional question is what sets
this above other episodes of the series.
Of course, more than
interesting concepts are needed for a "Star Trek" film.
The ideas alone will not carry the rest of the film. (The "Star
Trek" film with the most intelligent premise, no less than
in inquiry into what distinguishes a valid religion from a false
one, was STAR TREK V: THE FINAL FRONTIER. The ideas were really
engaging, but the rest of that film was way out of kilter, and it
became the most unpopular entry in the series.)
NEMESIS does offer
more. The action has a slow start, but in the second half it takes
off. About the best the script offers for action in the first half
is a silly dune buggy chase. The second half, however, serves up
a show stopping visual image that is worth the wait.
I will not go into
detail about the plot. Suffice it to say that the twin planets of
Romulus and Remus (those *must* be the Earth names for them) are
undergoing political upheavals. Their new leader is the Reman Praetor
Shinzon (Tom Hardy), literally a clone of Picard. Shinzon offers
much-desired peace to the Federation.
Unfortunately he
is not played by a heart-throb, there are harsh phonics in his name,
and there are sinister chords in the musical score when we see him,
so Picard is rightly suspicious of him. Meanwhile Data (Brent Spiner)
is fascinated with a new robot found in pieces on a desert planet
and reassembled.
It is B4, a prototype
of the robots that became Data and it looks just like him (also
played by Brent Spiner, of course). The plot is one of the better
ones for the film series, and it is not immediately obvious where
the story is going except it is a good bet that it will involve
space battles.
The old crew is around
and good to see. Patrick Stewart, is, of course, a fine actor always,
even if the "Star Trek" people do not give him enough
new to do. At one point he does get a chance to wax poetic and say
that like other commanders he awaits the dawn.
Ironically, the piece
is edited right into a look at the exterior of the ship which is
in space and clearly has a long wait before what one would call
a dawn comes. Brent Spiner is getting a little old to play the never-aging
robot Data. Old Data may be unreliable. Jonathan Frakes seems to
take little part in this story other than to get Will Riker married.
That is fine by most
of the fans. It is not clear how he has survived so many years of
Picard giving the order to "Fire at Will." Ron Perlman
is hard to recognize under his makeup, but I imagine he is used
to that. Tom Hardy does not look or sound enough like Picard, in
spite of trying to affect the accent (as if that part were genetic).
I would bet that at
some point in production Shinzon was supposed to be played by Patrick
Stewart. They pose together in one scene as if the viewer is supposed
to be surprised seeing two copies of the same person, but they are
not enough alike to make that scene work.
Another less likely
possibility is that Shinzon was supposed to be played by Ben Kingsley.
Kingsley and Stewart are reputedly close friends who are often mistaken
for one another.
Overall the special
effects are done competently, though certain scenes look cartoonish.
The "Big Scene" is executed very well with a lot of information
on the screen in exquisite detail. When the DVD comes out I am sure
the fans will play the scene over and over.
Jerry Goldsmith has
provided a fine score reusing some of his familiar but welcome "Star
Trek" themes. I rate STAR TREK: NEMESIS a 7 on the 0 to 10
scale and a low +2 on the -4 to +4 scale. One thing I will say that
the filmmakers got right that most sci-fi films get wrong.
Data is absolutely
right that an identical clone is not another version of the same
person. Identical twins can be quite different in many ways, particularly
if they have different backgrounds.
Films like THE SIXTH
DAY frequently get that concept wrong.
Mark R. Leeper
Copyright 2002 Mark R. Leeper
|